<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Technology Save Advertising?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelostjacket.com/advertising/will-technology-save-advertising/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelostjacket.com/advertising/will-technology-save-advertising</link>
	<description>Community, Creativity and Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:05:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Martin</title>
		<link>http://thelostjacket.com/advertising/will-technology-save-advertising/comment-page-1#comment-3516</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelostjacket.com/?p=3520#comment-3516</guid>
		<description>Stuart&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting POV...but like many of these &quot;advertising is dead long live social media&quot; posts -- devoid of statistics that prove the point. The truth is, advertising, at least good advertising, still works (think Apple who has virtually no real social media effort of note but one hell of an ad campaign) and can more quickly scale a product introduction or a political issue than Social Media could ever hope to. Why? Because whether you believe those metrics or not, mass media is still the most cost efficient manner to reach large audiences quickly. And lastly, there are actually target audiences out there, valuable ones, that are not big consumers of online and social networks. So for brands wanting to reach those audiences, advertising is still a solid choice. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are there times where Social Media is better suited for a job than say advertising? Absolutely and THAT is the big shift I think ad agency folks better get behind sooner rather than later. &lt;br&gt;  @TomMartin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart</p>
<p>Interesting POV&#8230;but like many of these &#8220;advertising is dead long live social media&#8221; posts &#8212; devoid of statistics that prove the point. The truth is, advertising, at least good advertising, still works (think Apple who has virtually no real social media effort of note but one hell of an ad campaign) and can more quickly scale a product introduction or a political issue than Social Media could ever hope to. Why? Because whether you believe those metrics or not, mass media is still the most cost efficient manner to reach large audiences quickly. And lastly, there are actually target audiences out there, valuable ones, that are not big consumers of online and social networks. So for brands wanting to reach those audiences, advertising is still a solid choice. </p>
<p>Are there times where Social Media is better suited for a job than say advertising? Absolutely and THAT is the big shift I think ad agency folks better get behind sooner rather than later. <br />  @TomMartin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Martin</title>
		<link>http://thelostjacket.com/advertising/will-technology-save-advertising/comment-page-1#comment-2900</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelostjacket.com/?p=3520#comment-2900</guid>
		<description>Stuart&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting POV...but like many of these &quot;advertising is dead long live social media&quot; posts -- devoid of statistics that prove the point. The truth is, advertising, at least good advertising, still works (think Apple who has virtually no real social media effort of note but one hell of an ad campaign) and can more quickly scale a product introduction or a political issue than Social Media could ever hope to. Why? Because whether you believe those metrics or not, mass media is still the most cost efficient manner to reach large audiences quickly. And lastly, there are actually target audiences out there, valuable ones, that are not big consumers of online and social networks. So for brands wanting to reach those audiences, advertising is still a solid choice. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are there times where Social Media is better suited for a job than say advertising? Absolutely and THAT is the big shift I think ad agency folks better get behind sooner rather than later. &lt;br&gt;  @TomMartin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart</p>
<p>Interesting POV&#8230;but like many of these &#8220;advertising is dead long live social media&#8221; posts &#8212; devoid of statistics that prove the point. The truth is, advertising, at least good advertising, still works (think Apple who has virtually no real social media effort of note but one hell of an ad campaign) and can more quickly scale a product introduction or a political issue than Social Media could ever hope to. Why? Because whether you believe those metrics or not, mass media is still the most cost efficient manner to reach large audiences quickly. And lastly, there are actually target audiences out there, valuable ones, that are not big consumers of online and social networks. So for brands wanting to reach those audiences, advertising is still a solid choice. </p>
<p>Are there times where Social Media is better suited for a job than say advertising? Absolutely and THAT is the big shift I think ad agency folks better get behind sooner rather than later. <br />  @TomMartin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Martin</title>
		<link>http://thelostjacket.com/advertising/will-technology-save-advertising/comment-page-1#comment-2465</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelostjacket.com/?p=3520#comment-2465</guid>
		<description>Stuart&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting POV...but like many of these &quot;advertising is dead long live social media&quot; posts -- devoid of statistics that prove the point. The truth is, advertising, at least good advertising, still works (think Apple who has virtually no real social media effort of note but one hell of an ad campaign) and can more quickly scale a product introduction or a political issue than Social Media could ever hope to. Why? Because whether you believe those metrics or not, mass media is still the most cost efficient manner to reach large audiences quickly. And lastly, there are actually target audiences out there, valuable ones, that are not big consumers of online and social networks. So for brands wanting to reach those audiences, advertising is still a solid choice. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are there times where Social Media is better suited for a job than say advertising? Absolutely and THAT is the big shift I think ad agency folks better get behind sooner rather than later. &lt;br&gt;  @TomMartin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart</p>
<p>Interesting POV&#8230;but like many of these &#8220;advertising is dead long live social media&#8221; posts &#8212; devoid of statistics that prove the point. The truth is, advertising, at least good advertising, still works (think Apple who has virtually no real social media effort of note but one hell of an ad campaign) and can more quickly scale a product introduction or a political issue than Social Media could ever hope to. Why? Because whether you believe those metrics or not, mass media is still the most cost efficient manner to reach large audiences quickly. And lastly, there are actually target audiences out there, valuable ones, that are not big consumers of online and social networks. So for brands wanting to reach those audiences, advertising is still a solid choice. </p>
<p>Are there times where Social Media is better suited for a job than say advertising? Absolutely and THAT is the big shift I think ad agency folks better get behind sooner rather than later. <br />  @TomMartin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Martin</title>
		<link>http://thelostjacket.com/advertising/will-technology-save-advertising/comment-page-1#comment-2056</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelostjacket.com/?p=3520#comment-2056</guid>
		<description>Stuart&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting POV...but like many of these &quot;advertising is dead long live social media&quot; posts -- devoid of statistics that prove the point. The truth is, advertising, at least good advertising, still works (think Apple who has virtually no real social media effort of note but one hell of an ad campaign) and can more quickly scale a product introduction or a political issue than Social Media could ever hope to. Why? Because whether you believe those metrics or not, mass media is still the most cost efficient manner to reach large audiences quickly. And lastly, there are actually target audiences out there, valuable ones, that are not big consumers of online and social networks. So for brands wanting to reach those audiences, advertising is still a solid choice. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are there times where Social Media is better suited for a job than say advertising? Absolutely and THAT is the big shift I think ad agency folks better get behind sooner rather than later. &lt;br&gt;  @TomMartin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart</p>
<p>Interesting POV&#8230;but like many of these &#8220;advertising is dead long live social media&#8221; posts &#8212; devoid of statistics that prove the point. The truth is, advertising, at least good advertising, still works (think Apple who has virtually no real social media effort of note but one hell of an ad campaign) and can more quickly scale a product introduction or a political issue than Social Media could ever hope to. Why? Because whether you believe those metrics or not, mass media is still the most cost efficient manner to reach large audiences quickly. And lastly, there are actually target audiences out there, valuable ones, that are not big consumers of online and social networks. So for brands wanting to reach those audiences, advertising is still a solid choice. </p>
<p>Are there times where Social Media is better suited for a job than say advertising? Absolutely and THAT is the big shift I think ad agency folks better get behind sooner rather than later. <br />  @TomMartin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakyastik</title>
		<link>http://thelostjacket.com/advertising/will-technology-save-advertising/comment-page-1#comment-2054</link>
		<dc:creator>jakyastik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelostjacket.com/?p=3520#comment-2054</guid>
		<description>I mean to say that the future of advertising will of course involve technology. But, people have started to adopt a true ideology that advertisements are nothing but products trying to tell you that they exist. Creativity in advertisements works, but not if you have a dumb ass product. When technology and advertisements come together, we call it expert media - where products are advertised by experts in their niche. Clear? okay, let&#039;s continue this conversation till it gets clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean to say that the future of advertising will of course involve technology. But, people have started to adopt a true ideology that advertisements are nothing but products trying to tell you that they exist. Creativity in advertisements works, but not if you have a dumb ass product. When technology and advertisements come together, we call it expert media &#8211; where products are advertised by experts in their niche. Clear? okay, let&#39;s continue this conversation till it gets clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuartfoster</title>
		<link>http://thelostjacket.com/advertising/will-technology-save-advertising/comment-page-1#comment-2053</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuartfoster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelostjacket.com/?p=3520#comment-2053</guid>
		<description>Huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jakyastik</title>
		<link>http://thelostjacket.com/advertising/will-technology-save-advertising/comment-page-1#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>jakyastik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelostjacket.com/?p=3520#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s not about how technology will save on advertising. It&#039;s more about the future of advertising itself. If that can happen, the future has to change and adopt to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#39;s not about how technology will save on advertising. It&#39;s more about the future of advertising itself. If that can happen, the future has to change and adopt to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/19 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 349/357 objects using disk: basic

Served from: thelostjacket.com @ 2012-02-12 23:01:26 -->
