Email The Lost Jacket Subcribe to the blog via RSS

Brands Shouldn't Build Ecosystems, They Should Improve Them

by Stuart Foster on December 20, 2010

Connecting the dots

Andrew Carnegie's style of vertical integration is no longer possible for most (if not all) companies. The primary reason being that we've moved from a brick and mortar world to a digital one. You can't really "own" data and code.

Numerous attempts at controlling the flow and spread of code (see DRM, CD keys etc.) have failed miserably due to the culture of free that seems to propagate the digital world. Therefore any attempt to build a stand alone ecosystem will fail. If it doesn't connect; it doesn't work.

The How

Why then do companies like Facebook and Google succeed while more traditional companies flounder? By embracing the idea of fluid integration.

Vertical integration relies on a closed loop. Fluid integration relies on an open loop.

How does fluid integration work? Collect data from consumers, not in the traditional sense though. By providing various utilities, services and experiences companies can learn more about you. All they ask in return? A small tracking code that follows you around the web. Thus, the ecosystem that they create is one that doesn't rely on control but rather the sharing and propagation of data.

The Why

When setting out to build something we have to consider that people use products for two reasons:

1. They need the product.

2. The product was recommended to them.

New products (especially digital ones) rarely fall into the first category. After all, if someone needed something wouldn't they have already invented it? Start-ups live and die by the mantra that they are inventing something that people need, they just don't know it yet.

This is also why 90% of start-ups will fail.

Corporations can't innovate the same way start ups do. The reason? They need to make money. Their  margins are slimmer thus so is their appetite for risk.  Every action they take will have an impact on the bottom line.

The Evolution

How then do corporations/agencies innovate effectively?

  1. Allow any (non-sensitive) data  you possess to be accessed via an API.
  2. Does someone do something better than you do? Integrate and connect with ecosystems already in existence.
  3. Ask your customers. They're just as invested in your brand as you are and can provide the "Emperor has no clothes." type of advice that goes overlooked by internal resources.
  4. Test. Test. Test. You can't innovate unless you test/try out new features.

How else can we improve/innovate a company's experience? I'd love to hear your thoughts.

Image Credit: kalebrewer

pixel Brands Shouldnt Build Ecosystems, They Should Improve Them

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment, showing us some social love or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Digg this article
  • Bookmark this post on Delicious
  • Stumble this post
  • Upvote this article on Reddit

tagged as , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
happyfine 5 pts

How does fluid integration http://www.thomasaboshop.com/thomas-sabo-charm-car... work? Collect data from consumers, not in the http://www.thomasaboshop.com/thomas-sabo-necklaces... traditional sense though. By providing various utilities, http://www.thomasaboshop.com/thomas-sabo-jewelry.h... services and experiences companies can learn more about you. All they ask in http://www.thomasaboshop.com/thomas-sabo-online-sh... return? A small tracking code that follows you around the web. Thus, the ecosystem that they create is one that doesn't rely on control but rather the http://www.thomasaboshop.com/thomas-sabo-chains.ht... sharing and propagation of data.

aijing2011 5 pts

A Rolex Does More Than Just Tell You the Time Even as you read these words someone, somewhere on this planet will be venturing into the unknown. They might be at the sea--a tiny speck in the ocean aboard a frail craft inching its way across the Pacific. Or deep below the surface of the water,probing Earth’s inner space. Or weathering a dust storm in the pitiless heat of an unmapped desert. Or braving temperatures 60 degrees below freezing as they urge their dog-sled across the Polar ice- cap. Only a fool would enter the inhospitable environment that these people seek out without weeks, months, or even years of preparation. The equipment they will have chosen to accompany their adventure will have been selected with the utmost care; their reliance on this equipment will be total. Yet the chances are that one of their most vital pieces of equipment will be on their wrist. A Rolex Oyster. <strong><a href="http://www.barwatches.com/panerai.html">panerai watches</a></strong> Somewhere in the world--in dense jungle, or basking desert, or Polar wasteland--an explorer could even now be navigating by dead reckoning. For this task, an absolutely reliable time-piece is essential. Ever since its introduction in 1926, the Rolex Oyster <strong><a href="http://www.barwatches.com/panerai.html">panerai</a></strong> has been the choice of explorers and adventurers. The virtual indestructibility of the Oyster case and the utter reliability of the movement it contains have ensured that countless Oysters have accompanied their wearers into the history books. Yet the Rolex Oysters that have voyaged to the ends of the earth and depths of the ocean are in every respect the same watch that you will find in any official Rolex jeweler. Every single Rolex Oyster that leaves Geneva is capable of accompanying its owner wherever he or she cares to venture. Where in the world will you be taking yours?