Email The Lost Jacket Subcribe to the blog via RSS

Knowing Something First Doesn't Make You Smarter

by Bournesocial on August 19, 2009

Arnold Horshack

Michael Bourne has been in the PR biz for over a decade and is now working at Mullen where he is increasingly trying to break out of the silos of marketing and deliver something that hasn’t been done before. He writes a blog called Bourne Social.

We all remember grade school when the teacher would ask the class a question and there was always one kid who would raise his hand high and beg the teacher to “Pick me!” This boy (or girl) would inevitably be teased by classmates and probably not find a date to the Junior prom. But later in life, this striver, who had not only a thirst for knowledge but also a desire to show others that he knew more than them, would hopefully realize that simply getting an A on an exam was more valuable than being thrown into a locker.

This is not the point where I say: and that kid was me. No, I knew the answers. But I saw how the know-it-all was treated, and I did attend Junior prom (twice). Instead of showing the world that I knew more than others, I did the work required to learn and succeed. Success was its own reward and knowing that I knew was enough.

Fast forward to today when the second a new widget, app, social media tool, online service, etc. comes on the market there is a rush by eager beavers, now all grown up, who raise their hands to tell the world about this amazing new thing-a-ma-jig. Just seconds from the launch of something new, they want to tweet it out, post it on their Facebook profile or blog. Maybe they come by your desk at work and tell you about it, then act surprised when you say “Gee I haven’t heard of that tweet-mee-beep-yo-baby tool yet, but it sounds cool,” and then they walk away after snorting at you in derision like you’re an ignoramus.

Sound familiar? Know anyone like this? And do they work in I.T.? The fact is, when you know something before others know it, there’s a high, like you are in on a special secret. But here’s the reality when you come back down: You didn’t invent that new cool thing, you really aren’t the first to know about it, and acting like you know more than others just makes them want to throw you into a locker.

If your cohort of followers and friends are a bunch of similarly inclined “Pick me!” types, then they’ll re-tweet/re-post the thing you found, providing validation that, yes, you are in fact super-cool. Finding the cool thing first, and then having your cohort parrot out your findings, is what passes for influence in some circles. But not in my circle.

My job is to promote cool new things to as many people as I possibly can that matter. How they choose to use that information sets apart the smart from the seemingly smart. Because knowing that something exists before someone else knows isn’t intelligence. Intelligence is knowing how to use that cool new thing really well to accomplish something. And if something’s really cool, you really don’t want anyone else to know about it. You want it to be your special secret. Still, you’ll probably resent it when other people figure it out on their own, and you’ll tell anyone who’ll listen that it was better before everyone else ruined it. Maybe some clients will be impressed with your knowledge about something they don’t know, and maybe they’ll even think you’re smarter. But you’re probably not. You just know something they don’t know yet.

There is a danger in leading others to the great new thing. Consider this: when you transport cows to a slaughterhouse, they don’t want to go inside, and they’re scared. But there’s one cow that stays at the slaughterhouse and is there to greet its frightened mates. This cow is called the Judas Cow. This cow that the other cows trust has been trained to lead the others to the killing floor, and steps out of the way at the last second, betraying the unfortunate cows who are slaughtered.

So, before you fall for the next big thing, ask yourself if not sharing it is better than sharing it, if sharing it will reflect poorly on you, and whether the thing you’re so concerned about knowing first is really just going to lead your followers to the slaughter.
HappyCow1 150x150 Knowing Something First Doesnt Make You Smarter

pixel Knowing Something First Doesnt Make You Smarter

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment, showing us some social love or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Digg this article
  • Bookmark this post on Delicious
  • Stumble this post
  • Upvote this article on Reddit

tagged as , , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Thank you. Good points. Being somewhere first doesn't make you better, either. There's a lot of that attitude on Twitter these days. You're right. Look before retweet. Better to respond than to react. (If only I followed this 100% of the time.) Like Mckinneyos, the story about the Judas Cow really hit me. Very disturbing. There goes plans for a burger tonight.

It seems people are still sorting out their roles in this space. Some see themselves as aggregators (pull information together where people can find it easily), others as connectors (connect ideas to another, or people to one another), others as creators (new ideas). Each role has value, and there's obviously a vast spectrum of quality within each of the roles.

I agree there appears to be an increasing imbalance between roles--lots of aggregators and (attempted) connectors--not too many creators. That's all complicated, of course, by the fact that there are a lot of very bad aggregators and connectors. AND creators.

There will be some whose "first" nature is valuable--particularly the clairvoyant early adopters who always seem to find the next big thing before anyone else, or the folks who live on their RSS feeds and manage to quickly (and important: consistently) find great information and get it out there as soon as it appears. I'd say it's particularly hard to spot good creators early. Someone can have one great idea and they're done. Others take a while to find their stride.

So, like all things, value is revealed by time--which is why "me, first!" is an easily ignored trait.

That's a sound method for keeping the hype out of the sharing. Sometimes it seems that we're a generation of over-sharers. You could spend all of your time Digging interesting material, retweeting and reposting content, and create nothing of value yourself. To me, being active in social media is having thought+action. Actions minus thought are animal impulses. Don't give into your inner Judas Cow.

Yeah, the whole Judas Cow thing is really disturbing. When I learned about it i didn't eat meat for a week. Don't get me started on chickens!

What's happening is that people are re-tweeting without reading, and things that are seen as firsts get attention from people who want to be seen as ahead of the curve. As a result we're winding up hyping things that need to be examined in greater detail. With real discourse. Few things should receive instant fans. I'm not against people calling attention to things that matter, but please use discretion or you will become what Bill O'Reilly calls Ditto Heads.

Thank you. Good points. Being somewhere first doesn't make you better, either. There's a lot of that attitude on Twitter these days. You're right. Look before retweet. Better to respond than to react. (If only I followed this 100% of the time.) Like Mckinneyos, the story about the Judas Cow really hit me. Very disturbing. There goes plans for a burger tonight.

It seems people are still sorting out their roles in this space. Some see themselves as aggregators (pull information together where people can find it easily), others as connectors (connect ideas to another, or people to one another), others as creators (new ideas). Each role has value, and there's obviously a vast spectrum of quality within each of the roles.

I agree there appears to be an increasing imbalance between roles--lots of aggregators and (attempted) connectors--not too many creators. That's all complicated, of course, by the fact that there are a lot of very bad aggregators and connectors. AND creators.

There will be some whose "first" nature is valuable--particularly the clairvoyant early adopters who always seem to find the next big thing before anyone else, or the folks who live on their RSS feeds and manage to quickly (and important: consistently) find great information and get it out there as soon as it appears. I'd say it's particularly hard to spot good creators early. Someone can have one great idea and they're done. Others take a while to find their stride.

So, like all things, value is revealed by time--which is why "me, first!" is an easily ignored trait.

That's a sound method for keeping the hype out of the sharing. Sometimes it seems that we're a generation of over-sharers. You could spend all of your time Digging interesting material, retweeting and reposting content, and create nothing of value yourself. To me, being active in social media is having thought+action. Actions minus thought are animal impulses. Don't give into your inner Judas Cow.

Yeah, the whole Judas Cow thing is really disturbing. When I learned about it i didn't eat meat for a week. Don't get me started on chickens!

What's happening is that people are re-tweeting without reading, and things that are seen as firsts get attention from people who want to be seen as ahead of the curve. As a result we're winding up hyping things that need to be examined in greater detail. With real discourse. Few things should receive instant fans. I'm not against people calling attention to things that matter, but please use discretion or you will become what Bill O'Reilly calls Ditto Heads.

Thank you. Good points. Being somewhere first doesn't make you better, either. There's a lot of that attitude on Twitter these days. You're right. Look before retweet. Better to respond than to react. (If only I followed this 100% of the time.) Like Mckinneyos, the story about the Judas Cow really hit me. Very disturbing. There goes plans for a burger tonight.

Thank you. Good points. Being somewhere first doesn't make you better, either. There's a lot of that attitude on Twitter these days. You're right. Look before retweet. Better to respond than to react. (If only I followed this 100% of the time.) Like Mckinneyos, the story about the Judas Cow really hit me. Very disturbing. There goes plans for a burger tonight.

It seems people are still sorting out their roles in this space. Some see themselves as aggregators (pull information together where people can find it easily), others as connectors (connect ideas to another, or people to one another), others as creators (new ideas). Each role has value, and there's obviously a vast spectrum of quality within each of the roles.

I agree there appears to be an increasing imbalance between roles--lots of aggregators and (attempted) connectors--not too many creators. That's all complicated, of course, by the fact that there are a lot of very bad aggregators and connectors. AND creators.

There will be some whose "first" nature is valuable--particularly the clairvoyant early adopters who always seem to find the next big thing before anyone else, or the folks who live on their RSS feeds and manage to quickly (and important: consistently) find great information and get it out there as soon as it appears. I'd say it's particularly hard to spot good creators early. Someone can have one great idea and they're done. Others take a while to find their stride.

So, like all things, value is revealed by time--which is why "me, first!" is an easily ignored trait.

It seems people are still sorting out their roles in this space. Some see themselves as aggregators (pull information together where people can find it easily), others as connectors (connect ideas to another, or people to one another), others as creators (new ideas). Each role has value, and there's obviously a vast spectrum of quality within each of the roles.

I agree there appears to be an increasing imbalance between roles--lots of aggregators and (attempted) connectors--not too many creators. That's all complicated, of course, by the fact that there are a lot of very bad aggregators and connectors. AND creators.

There will be some whose "first" nature is valuable--particularly the clairvoyant early adopters who always seem to find the next big thing before anyone else, or the folks who live on their RSS feeds and manage to quickly (and important: consistently) find great information and get it out there as soon as it appears. I'd say it's particularly hard to spot good creators early. Someone can have one great idea and they're done. Others take a while to find their stride.

So, like all things, value is revealed by time--which is why "me, first!" is an easily ignored trait.

That's a sound method for keeping the hype out of the sharing. Sometimes it seems that we're a generation of over-sharers. You could spend all of your time Digging interesting material, retweeting and reposting content, and create nothing of value yourself. To me, being active in social media is having thought+action. Actions minus thought are animal impulses. Don't give into your inner Judas Cow.

That's a sound method for keeping the hype out of the sharing. Sometimes it seems that we're a generation of over-sharers. You could spend all of your time Digging interesting material, retweeting and reposting content, and create nothing of value yourself. To me, being active in social media is having thought+action. Actions minus thought are animal impulses. Don't give into your inner Judas Cow.

Yeah, the whole Judas Cow thing is really disturbing. When I learned about it i didn't eat meat for a week. Don't get me started on chickens!

What's happening is that people are re-tweeting without reading, and things that are seen as firsts get attention from people who want to be seen as ahead of the curve. As a result we're winding up hyping things that need to be examined in greater detail. With real discourse. Few things should receive instant fans. I'm not against people calling attention to things that matter, but please use discretion or you will become what Bill O'Reilly calls Ditto Heads.

Thank you. Good points. Being somewhere first doesn't make you better, either. There's a lot of that attitude on Twitter these days. You're right. Look before retweet. Better to respond than to react. (If only I followed this 100% of the time.) Like Mckinneyos, the story about the Judas Cow really hit me. Very disturbing. There goes plans for a burger tonight.

It seems people are still sorting out their roles in this space. Some see themselves as aggregators (pull information together where people can find it easily), others as connectors (connect ideas to another, or people to one another), others as creators (new ideas). Each role has value, and there's obviously a vast spectrum of quality within each of the roles.

I agree there appears to be an increasing imbalance between roles--lots of aggregators and (attempted) connectors--not too many creators. That's all complicated, of course, by the fact that there are a lot of very bad aggregators and connectors. AND creators.

There will be some whose "first" nature is valuable--particularly the clairvoyant early adopters who always seem to find the next big thing before anyone else, or the folks who live on their RSS feeds and manage to quickly (and important: consistently) find great information and get it out there as soon as it appears. I'd say it's particularly hard to spot good creators early. Someone can have one great idea and they're done. Others take a while to find their stride.

So, like all things, value is revealed by time--which is why "me, first!" is an easily ignored trait.

That's a sound method for keeping the hype out of the sharing. Sometimes it seems that we're a generation of over-sharers. You could spend all of your time Digging interesting material, retweeting and reposting content, and create nothing of value yourself. To me, being active in social media is having thought+action. Actions minus thought are animal impulses. Don't give into your inner Judas Cow.

Yeah, the whole Judas Cow thing is really disturbing. When I learned about it i didn't eat meat for a week. Don't get me started on chickens!

What's happening is that people are re-tweeting without reading, and things that are seen as firsts get attention from people who want to be seen as ahead of the curve. As a result we're winding up hyping things that need to be examined in greater detail. With real discourse. Few things should receive instant fans. I'm not against people calling attention to things that matter, but please use discretion or you will become what Bill O'Reilly calls Ditto Heads.

One of the things about sharing, is to your point do you even get why you are sharing it. What is the value of the information you are sharing and why. Which is at times why the "retweet" of information on Twitter is somewhat boxing. Often times a user can't say here is why I think this is important. Which of course leads to the argument you should have a blog for that, to which I would say if we are all blogging who is reading?

I have tried to look at it from a read, comment and share structure. That works best for me to provide some value to the creator of content, as well as the poor souls interested in my opinion ;)

I've never understood people's obsession with being first, especially when it comes to knowledge. I understand excitement about being the first to DO something (like, being the first to make a million dollars), but I'm not real impressed with the first person to sign up for Twitter.

Anyways, the real reason I'm commenting is to let you know that that whole Judas Cow thing made me want to cry. Wow. I had no clue that was how my hamburger was made...

Trackbacks

  1. [...] This post originally appeared on The Lost Jacket [...]