Email The Lost Jacket Subcribe to the blog via RSS

11 Content Secrets...From Newspapers?

by Stuart Foster on September 28, 2009

Newspaper

"If it bleeds, it leads."

Newspapers have more in common with blogs then they care to admit, despite what many of the purists think. They rely on advertising, classifieds and volume of subscriptions to stay in business. They are crumbling due to the proliferation of "free" as the currency of the internet and content models lacking a brick and mortar infrastructure. Thus, most newspapers are facing bankruptcy (or are already bankrupt) as a result.

Currently newspapers are only good at one thing: providing content. Over the years editors and writers have learned plenty of great methods for creating content that sticks.

Remember: Newspapers aren't losing readers: they are losing their business model.

Content never goes out of style, especially when it is sticky, well written and extremely targeted. Therefore, we can learn plenty from the old school media when it comes to content creation:

1. Editorialize. You need to have an opinion and speak about it passionately. Otherwise, who would be interested in reading your work?

2. Pictures are your best friend. A great article starts with a great graphic, blog posts are no different.

3. Craft your headline effectively. The difference between massive readership and crickets? Your headline.

4. Syndicate your content. The AP is powerful for a reason. They allow newspapers to re-tool, rework and reuse their content. Allow your content to be taken to where the readers are. (As long as proper credit is given.)

5. Be as concise and direct as possible. No one wants to read a 2,000 word treatise on marketing. Not even marketers.

6. Write for your desired target audience. Don't try and pander to everyone.

7. Write a series on a specific topic. Best way to get someone to read your next post? End on a cliffhanger.

8. Don't lose focus and go off track. Most people will lose interest and not even click through from their RSS.

9. Construct your post effectively and lay out your points in an easy to follow manner. Each post should at least have a beginning, middle and end. Lists are fantastic for communicating content (and nothing gets traffic like a list.)

10. Try and build your readership with each post. Don't just throw out content and hope something will stick. Challenge your audience.

11. Be consistent and maintain a certain level of quality with each post. If you don't? You run the risk of losing respect and readers.

Photo Credit: drb62

Bonus:

Try and teach your readers something with each post.

What do you recommend others do to create great content? Follow the lead of the newspapers or go in a different direction? Would love to hear your thoughts below:

pixel 11 Content Secrets...From Newspapers?

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment, showing us some social love or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Digg this article
  • Bookmark this post on Delicious
  • Stumble this post
  • Upvote this article on Reddit

tagged as , , , , , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Great post overall. But the emPHAsis was on the WRong syLLAble. Blogs took their model from columnists and reporters in NEWSPAPERS.

While it might be semantic to play chicken and egg with this conversation, the lessons and training professional journalists have gained from their newspaper experience often trumps the seat-of-the-pants perspectives bloggers share.

The tide is changing fast though. Business models be darned, I give credit to discerning news and information consumers as the real reason our communication channels are changing.

Great post overall. But the emPHAsis was on the WRong syLLAble. Blogs took their model from columnists and reporters in NEWSPAPERS.

While it might be semantic to play chicken and egg with this conversation, the lessons and training professional journalists have gained from their newspaper experience often trumps the seat-of-the-pants perspectives bloggers share.

The tide is changing fast though. Business models be darned, I give credit to discerning news and information consumers as the real reason our communication channels are changing.

Great post overall. But the emPHAsis was on the WRong syLLAble. Blogs took their model from columnists and reporters in NEWSPAPERS.

While it might be semantic to play chicken and egg with this conversation, the lessons and training professional journalists have gained from their newspaper experience often trumps the seat-of-the-pants perspectives bloggers share.

The tide is changing fast though. Business models be darned, I give credit to discerning news and information consumers as the real reason our communication channels are changing.

Great post overall. But the emPHAsis was on the WRong syLLAble. Blogs took their model from columnists and reporters in NEWSPAPERS.

While it might be semantic to play chicken and egg with this conversation, the lessons and training professional journalists have gained from their newspaper experience often trumps the seat-of-the-pants perspectives bloggers share.

The tide is changing fast though. Business models be darned, I give credit to discerning news and information consumers as the real reason our communication channels are changing.

It's been evolving that way since the media release, but these days, directly syndicated web content comes from all sorts of places - business, bloggers, citizens.

Fact checking is a critical role, but what's a little disturbing to me about syndicated content's impact on legacy media is the quality, depth, and bias of this type of content. Not that I don't personally love a short, interesting opinion piece from my favorite blogger. But that's not journalism. It is, however, increasingly becoming the "content" of the news.

Scan the front page and most popular pages of your favorite news website and you'll get an eyeful of exactly what people want to read. The preferred American media diet is, like our preferred food diet, not always what's good for us.

Balance, as with all things, is essential. So organizations who can figure out, deliver, and embrace this balance (and get the public to embrace it) will be the ones who figure out how to evolve what it is we've called news, or media, or journalism.

Who will those be? That's yet to be seen.

I had been thinking almost the opposite for a while - that individuals act as content filters. The culture of retweeting/reblogging seems to suggest this. However, given the general trustworthiness of legacy media it might make sense that readers us such sources as filters. Yet I think there's room for both, with different sources running the gamut between original content creators, remixers, and straight up rebloggers.

What about all the ex-print journalists getting picked up by AOL's mediaglow? Any ideas on how this might affect niche news delivery?

Also,
"2. Pictures are your best friend. A great article starts with a great graphic, blog posts are no different." Pretty sure I the one for this article on techcrunch a couple weeks ago (but does that mean it's a good choice or a bad one?)

So I think something really interesting is the evolution of the legacy media into a filter rather than a content creator.

I like that statement a LOT. That definitely describes where the medium is going to a tee. So much information is being disseminated...we need editors and gatekeepers to be fact checkers more than anything.

I was just about to Tweet how funny it was that the three stories I clicked on from CNN today were syndicated content from blogs!

I do think there are some deeper issues at play when it comes to the media, though, than just losing a business model. In the crumbling of that business model comes into play the idea of media as the fourth estate, the ethics and integrity of journalism, and what happens to public information with these things happening... at the same time media is opening up more and more to participatory content creation.

Though you're right about readers. The readers are still around, they're just fragmenting where they are and where they're goind. So I think something really interesting is the evolution of the legacy media into a filter rather than a content creator. There's good potential for them there, and I think this, getting back to your post, is a great thing for web content creators to learn from too.

There might be a role for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting or similar congressionally-funded but privately-run organization, although I know the more libertarian think tanks like Cato are very much against this model (CPB budget is about 90% to PBS stations, which includes stations like WGBH that are more like production companies, which in turn make NOVA, Frontline, etc.).

I know, it is. My roommate and I subscribe to our local newspaper as well as The New York Times (she used to be a journalist) so she's especially nostalgic and supportive of the print world. I work in the online world, so it's an interesting comparison even though I'm pro newspapers :)

I also feel the same way about books. I love books and holding them in my hands and reading them. I feel like they're part of history and because of that I don't want a kindle. Maybe I'm being resistant to times changing but I'm happy with books for now.

The current economic model can not support investigative journalism. I think in the future we will be seeing more of an NPR model for newspapers...

Just my two cents.

Definitely. Access is a key issue facing a lot of brick and mortar houses right now.

Unfortunately, I have checked out newspaperdeathwatch.com (I believe they also have a twitter account.) Kind of sad to thumb through though.

I really like, "newspapers aren't losing readers: they're losing their business model." I think it's so true. Good content is good content. Although it might change how we ACCESS that content...

On another note, have you checked out (http://www.newspaperdeathwatch.com/)?

While I think these points are valid, I think the deeper issue with newspapers losing their business model is that it was a structure that supported investigative journalism. At least right now, having great blog content doesn't get you access to a big-shot executive, or attractive a government or corporate whistleblower to talk to you; the Washington Post ID badge (and associated brand) does.

Since I think that journalism provides a social good (specifically in the area of government transparency), I think we need to figure out a new business model for them, very probably still content oriented, that gives them the relative luxury of being able to follow a story for a year or more, as deep as the rabbit hole goes.