Email The Lost Jacket Subcribe to the blog via RSS

The Insertion Point

by Stuart Foster on June 23, 2009

steampunk pc keys 500x382 The Insertion Point

As I begin to work with larger brands and companies that are just beginning to make the transition into social I keep running into this question: How do I start?

It's a fair question. For companies with millions of dollars in advertising tied up in regular campaigns and strategies the concept of going into social media is terrifying. They don't even know how to begin the process.

A painless way does exist though: Jump start your social media program by launching it on the back of a traditional campaign. How? By merely continuing the conversation once the campaign ends and building yourselves a path/plan to enter into a more robust social presence.

Why is this more effective then simply jumping into social? It allows upper management and your employees to become accustomed to the social space and allow yourselves to have a beach head. You know how to utilize traditional campaigns, use that knowledge to branch out into social.

How do you make this leap?

1. You have to allow for flexibility within the campaign. Let go of the message to a certain extent. Otherwise you won't have an opportunity to learn how to engage and encourage your customers into a conversation. If you can't be flexible this technique won't work.

2. Don't use a hard sell. This isn't a normal campaign. You want buy in from customers for the long haul. You don't want to scare them off by being extremely aggressive.

3. Listen to your customer's feedback. Otherwise, you won't gain any benefit from taking your campaign into social. This way you can have access to and receive immediate feedback from your potential customers.

4. Social alone is worthless. You need to have all of the benefits of a fantastic traditional campaign in order for this to be effective. Otherwise the social won't be able to get off the ground. The goal here is to build up a following out of a non-social exercise then transfer those relationships into social media.

5. It doesn't count if you don't continue the conversation. If that singular campaign is your sole goal, don't bother adding a social media component. The solution for that is called "digital" and it has existed for some time.

This method is a painless way to enter the space. You eventually won't even notice that you are utilizing social techniques until you are truly vested. Play to your strengths and go traditional first and then launch into your social component.

pixel The Insertion Point

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment, showing us some social love or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Digg this article
  • Bookmark this post on Delicious
  • Stumble this post
  • Upvote this article on Reddit

tagged as , , , ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I always worry when companies decide (or are advised) that they want to "do" a purely social media-led campaign. It very rarely works (the Skittle homepage mess with Twitter feeds) and is only as good as the audience it's reaching (so, potentially more limited).

Like you say, mix it up - complement an existing and traditional approach and tailor it accordingly. It's true what they say - two heads are better than one.

I always worry when companies decide (or are advised) that they want to "do" a purely social media-led campaign. It very rarely works (the Skittle homepage mess with Twitter feeds) and is only as good as the audience it's reaching (so, potentially more limited).

Like you say, mix it up - complement an existing and traditional approach and tailor it accordingly. It's true what they say - two heads are better than one.

I always worry when companies decide (or are advised) that they want to "do" a purely social media-led campaign. It very rarely works (the Skittle homepage mess with Twitter feeds) and is only as good as the audience it's reaching (so, potentially more limited).

Like you say, mix it up - complement an existing and traditional approach and tailor it accordingly. It's true what they say - two heads are better than one.

I always worry when companies decide (or are advised) that they want to "do" a purely social media-led campaign. It very rarely works (the Skittle homepage mess with Twitter feeds) and is only as good as the audience it's reaching (so, potentially more limited).

Like you say, mix it up - complement an existing and traditional approach and tailor it accordingly. It's true what they say - two heads are better than one.

I think #3 is one a lot of companies forget about. They're so busy executing their campaign the way they planned it they either don't look at what people are saying or look at it and don't care (probably labeling them as being in the minority opinion).In reality, social media is probably the easiest and fastest way to get feedback on a traditional marketing campaign.

Using social media to listen to what customers are saying about a traditional campaign can not only help you in future campaigns, but sometimes even change directions during a campaign. Even when a company does buy into social media, I think they're still afraid of potential negative reactions by customers (via @ replies, comments, etc.), when this should actually get them excited as it helps point out areas for improvement.

I think the place to start is with listening. Granted, I don't work with big brands; I work with small biz owners mostly, and a majority of them tell me they don't do any monitoring and don't actually believe that people are talking about them online. But I think the first thing to do is monitor for at least a month before putting any other plans together.

Hi Stuart,

With the uses behind social media changing daily, flexibility seems to be more important than ever. Letting go of the message, as you put it, is so vital because if you keep hammering a message into people's heads, they're going to start viewing your efforts as purely one-directional, leaving no room for open conversation, which is what these social media tools are supposed to be helping us build.

Starting from the beginning, one must really listen to the communities out there. After listening, a company can really start to understand who they want (and need) to communicate with and what they want to communicate about.

The point is to not let your communication get bogged down with key messages, because I feel that can lead to a conversation turning stale. As you say, stay flexible and open to ensure you engage your customers beneficially.

Best,

Rich

I think #5 is so key to success b/c so many people want to run a "campaign," but if they want true success they need to have a "conversation." If you run something cool and don't build off of that momentum, all your fans/consumers are standing around going, "Now what? Where'd they go?"

Also, I think I'd add in a 0.5) listening. I'm not convinced it's safe to assume companies have done (or will do) this. And as far as I'm concerned you can't effectively proceed without listening first.

Have you found your Jacket? It's hot down here.