Email The Lost Jacket Subcribe to the blog via RSS

Twitter Shenanigans

by Stuart Foster on February 5, 2009

shenanigans Twitter Shenanigans

Over the past couple of months (but this week especially) I have begun to encounter people on Twitter (who I had never heard of) with abnormally large amounts of followers. The first thing I though to myself is I gotta follow them! They must be sharing some kind of valuable and useful information that I could learn a great deal from them. Heck if you have 15,000 followers...you must be doing something right. However, then I looked at the amount of tweets that they had: 250, 149, 1,000. Huh? I have been hardcore tweeting for about 7 months. I have nearly 3,000 tweets and only 1400 followers. What were these twitter users doing that I was not? How were they gaining followers at such a rapid pace? Could they be adding insane value to their followers?

I had to find out. So I asked around the Twittersphere, how could these users who I've never heard of gain so many followers? The answer of course was a script from Greasemonkey.

Essentially what the script does is seek out Twitter users who leave their "Auto-Follow" functionality turned on (and likely haven't visited the account in some time). Thus the users of said script are able to add followers in a rapid fashion...they are guaranteed an automatic follow back. Essentially it's a win-win for everyone right? Wrong. Although the amount of followers on Twitter is a great way to judge credibility of a user it should not be your only factor in deciding whether or not to follow said user. The gaming that takes place on Social Media networks will always be present. Some people want to take shortcuts to gain notoriety, interest, and buzz about themselves without contributing anything meaningful to the community. This is detrimental to the community as a whole.

Why is this a problem? Many new twitter users (myself included when I started out) view a follower count as the first best litmus test of whether to follow someone. If that person is adding value and being that interesting to that many people...how can I go wrong by following said person? Unfortunately, often these accounts aren't reputable and will provide bad or even worse, misleading advice to new users and users who might happen to be casual users.

What can we do to stop this epidemic? Well, a variety of options exist:

1. A rework of the auto-follow code to block the functionality of the Greasemonkey script (not a programmer...so no idea how this would be done. Assuming this would be done in-house on Twitter's end).

2. Ask around...the best way to learn from Twitter is to ask questions. So learn from others whether or not a person is legit or not.

3. Check out their follower to following ratio. Most enterprising users tend to follow fewer people then are following them. The reason being they probably don't know you yet and are waiting to see what kind of value you will bring.

4. Just use common sense. If someone has 250 tweets and 31,000 followers. They aren't legit unless they are a celebrity. (Think @THE_REAL_SHAQ)

People trying to beat the system is not a new phenomenon. It will always be a problem insocial media because of that first word: social. Everyone can be on Twitter...no real limitations exist at the moment to prevent you from gaming the system. However, if we work together we can stop some of these people from gaining ground and spreading misinformation. Twitter isn't about your follower count. It's about what you learn from your followers and the connections that you make. So have fun, don't be a Farva...and be wary of Twitter Shenanigans :) .

Related Posts with Thumbnails

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment, showing us some social love or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Digg this article
  • Bookmark this post on Delicious
  • Stumble this post
  • Upvote this article on Reddit

tagged as , , , , , ,

You're a moderator for http://thelostjacket.com Site admin
You're following this conversation Unfollow
Conversation 
Sign in and Post
Stuart Foster moderator
Pending approval

Digging up the pertinent information for you now. If it's not GM based I'll eat my words. But a reliable source informed me that that's what they were using.

Approve comment
Stuart Foster moderator
Pending approval

Digging up the pertinent information for you now. If it's not GM based I'll eat my words. But a reliable source informed me that that's what they were using.

Approve comment
Stuart Foster moderator
Pending approval

Digging up the pertinent information for you now. If it's not GM based I'll eat my words. But a reliable source informed me that that's what they were using.

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

Digging up the pertinent information for you now. If it's not GM based I'll eat my words. But a reliable source informed me that that's what they were using.

Approve comment
fantomaster moderator
Pending approval

Are you sure it exists in terms of actually having seen, possibly tested it yourself rather than merely reading about it? A Greasemonky script, as you say? There's others around, but they're not GM based. Merely inquiring to check if this isn't just another rumor mill a-spinning, or a case of mistaking one app for another. Would be nice to see something more definitive and verifiable, if it's not asking too much. (And don't get me wrong: I'm NOT saying you made this up, or anything - but this thingy does seem pretty hard to track down. Which is a mite strange if it's really being deployed as widely as you say it is.)

Approve comment
SEOAly moderator
Pending approval

Right back at 'cha, Stuart! I'm happy to have you as part of my Twitterverse. :) It doesn't seem like all that long ago one of my friends said, "Hey...have you heard of Twitter?" Almost 6500 updates later, here we are!

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

Oh...they are, love that movie. And Aly, you're one hell of a good Tweeple :) Glad to have met you early on!

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

Definitely, I feel like a broken record from how many times I have had to say "Twitter is all about the relationships"

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

Haha thanks...it was really really starting to piss me off. But hey...they are being Farvas :)

Approve comment
Alysson moderator
Pending approval

There is more to Twitter than generating followers for me. My goal isn't to build a rock star following of people who also follow thousands of other people and, because of that, never see even one of my tweets throughout the day. I follow fewer than 300 people and I'm sure I miss out on a lot of useful and relevant information just because of the noise in my Twitterstream. Everyone's goals for using Twitter are different, I suppose...but I actually use it to connect with people who share similar interests or, at the very least, have something interesting to say. I also don't reciprocal follow and certainly don't follow someone based on their number of followers. Most of the people I follow have some ties to the search marketing industry. Like JeremyVaught, I go through those I'm following periodically and weed out those who have never engaged me or offered anything useful that I can recall off hand. By the way, I absolutely adore that you used a picture from Super Troopers to illustrate shenanigans! Just for the record, I'm pretty sure they're really baked in that scene. I'm just sayin'!

Approve comment
andymurd moderator
Pending approval

Good detective work! I'd wondered the same thing but I soon worked out that the number of followers a person has is a very poor measure of their worth/interest. It's more fun to find those people who are interesting but have only just started tweeting and then interact with them. They might get 4,000 followers in the next twelve months, but they'll remember that you're the nice guy who chatted when they were starting out on twitter.

Approve comment
johnnywon moderator
Pending approval

I've noticed this epidemic as well. I do not know if it's really the worst thing in the world but I like this post. Love the graphic.

Approve comment
antfaber moderator
Pending approval

Why not just get rid of the auto-follow feature? If a twitterist has to confirm, this won't work.

Approve comment
1stAngel moderator
Pending approval

OOps lol sorry

Approve comment
Marvel Goose moderator
Pending approval

after 48 hours it just auto follows them anyway. I believe you can also set the waiting time.

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

Thanks Victor!

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

Thanks Victor!

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

Great idea. Def. going to test that out as well :)

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

The main reason it caught my attention is because a service like Twitbacks.com utilizes follower count to offer free custom backgrounds to that user. I definitely am pretty scatterbrained when I tweet. But I try to add lots of value when I can. I'm very interested (and knowledgeable) about marketing, branding, social media and advertising. So I pop my head into those conversations and add my 2 cents :).

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

As of right now I've had a hard time finding it Jesse. It definitely exists but I haven't been able to find a link (have to do a lot of digging for it apparently). Doubt anyone will send me the link now though...

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

That is definitely a great method Jeremy, I should probably utilize it more often. I tend to base my follow on a. job field b. amount of tweets c. value added and d. blog/website/company they are affiliated with.

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

Amount of followers to a person who has been using Twitter for awhile=worthless. Amount of followers to a person who is new to Twitter=Very Important. I'm just worried about people taking the advice of someone who has more perceived authority then they actually do... No money. But lots of jobs, business knowledge and important info gets passed around Twitter. In fact I've been concentrating on Twitter as one of my main sources for trying to find both consulting work and a marketing job.

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

Glad I could help you see what was up!

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

No problem, I was in the dark about it up until recently as well. I'm definitely glad I've gotten the word out though!

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

Wow, great response! Getting to all the questions now :)

Approve comment
Molly Bermea moderator
Pending approval

.... oh yes, sorry, got carried away. Thank you for the detailed explanation too. Great to be in-the-know. http://twitter.com/mollybermea

Approve comment
jessestay moderator
Pending approval

1stAngel, that's Greasemonkey itself. I'm looking for the actual script these people are using on top of Greasemonkey to do this.

Approve comment
Molly Bermea moderator
Pending approval

Realistically these people aren't really going to last out there in the Twittersphere. I have never been concerned with amounts of followers for others or for myself, although I know for a great number of Tweeters it is a daily goal it seems rather than gaining something from the actual experience. Anyway, I go through EACH and EVERY new Tweeter that follows me, check out their short profile, scan their most recent page of tweets to see if they've tweeted something valuable, visit their link and review their site (if they have one. annoying if they don't sometimes). I make my judgment mainly based on their site, BUT if they have failed to make ANY kind of valuable (to me) Tweet in the past 30-50 posts then I strongly consider not following. On the flip side, I myself might not even be that great a person to follow bc I can probably blast out 20+ lame tweets some days and others I try to post good content mixed in. So .... guess that's just how it goes. :) Anyway... I don't really get the stupid "How many ppl are following me" obsession anyway... using script to cheat is really lame. But who are they cheating.

Approve comment
1stAngel moderator
Pending approval

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748

Approve comment
jessestay moderator
Pending approval

Where is this GreaseMonkey script? I want to be sure we block its activity on Socialtoo. --Jesse Stay CEO, SocialToo.com

Approve comment
Michael moderator
Pending approval

A very educational post, thank you. I have been wondering how they did it and should had known the answer to be robots as GreaseMonkey. You sure add value to me, so you'r on my follow list for sure.

Approve comment
jeremyvaught moderator
Pending approval

My litmus test is simple. I read 2 or three pages of their tweets. If they have even one interesting post that provided me value, I will follow them back. That being said, I also periodically go back through who I am following, and if I can't dm them, they are not following me. If I still value them by name at that point, I continue to follow, otherwise, I drop 'em. What get's me is that some people, I have received probably 3 or 4 emails to follow them, they are clearly following and dropping only later to follow again. Drives me nuts.

Approve comment
Laura Norvig moderator
Pending approval

It sucks that people do this but it doesn't bother me because 1) I would never follow someone based solely on their number of followers and 2) I would never turn on autofollow. I don't understand why people do that. I don't feel any obligation to follow people who follow me. I follow people who are interesting. Is there really something to be gained by having lots of followers? Is there money in this game yet?

Approve comment
ickledot moderator
Pending approval

Thank you for that. I've been wondering how they do that.

Approve comment
adrielhampton moderator
Pending approval

Thanks for explaining that. I just figured they followed a bunch of people and see-sawed up that high. Silly me, not seeing the bots at work.

Approve comment
Marvel Goose moderator
Pending approval

I've been using Tweet-later to manage my auto follows. Gives you 48 hours to decide if you really want to follow or not.

Approve comment
vtbarrera moderator
Pending approval

Great Post. This is one of the most honest assessments I've read about this very popular but detrimental twitter trend.

Approve comment
Stuartfoster moderator
Pending approval

It definitely is an interesting phenomenon for sure...but I'm sure this kind of gaming will ultimately have a backlash effect.

Approve comment
Brett Borders moderator
Pending approval

I have played my Twitter account kind of passively, or "organically" and I think I've lost out because of it. I think there is some pretty serious auto-follow type gaming.... people spending time to build up lots of followers... and now I am kind of kicking myself not being a little more pro-active or aggressive... because Twitter is where I think a lot of the mainstream viral marketing is gonna be going down for a long time!

Approve comment

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Twitter Shenanigans | The Lost Jacket (tags: twitter) [...]